• Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Editor’s Pick
Market Gains Updates
Investing

Elon Musk says $1 million election giveaway wasn’t an illegal lottery

by January 27, 2025
by January 27, 2025

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) – Elon Musk asked a federal judge to dismiss a proposed class action by voters who said the world’s richest person defrauded them into signing a petition to support the U.S. Constitution for a chance to win his $1 million-a-day giveaway.

In a late Friday filing in the Austin, Texas federal court, Musk rejected the claim the giveaway was an illegal “lottery” that violated a Texas law against deceptive trade practices.

Arizona resident Jacqueline McAferty claimed that Musk and his political action committee America PAC falsely induced voters in seven battleground states to sign the petition by promising that winners would be chosen randomly.

Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump’s successful 2024 presidential run.

According to Musk, however, voters were told they would be reviewed for an opportunity to earn the $1 million by becoming America PAC spokespeople.

This, Musk said, defeated any notion that the money was a “prize” to be won.

“Make no mistake: an eligible voter’s opportunity to earn is not the same thing as a chance to win,” Musk said.

Chance, he added, “was not involved here.”

Musk also rejected the suggestion that petition signers suffered harm by providing their names, addresses and phone numbers, which they said Musk and America PAC could then sell.

Lawyers for the proposed class did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Sunday.

The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024.

A day earlier, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk’s giveaway, saying that city’s top prosecutor also failed to show it was an illegal lottery.

McAferty’s lawsuit seeks at least $5 million in damages for everyone who signed the petition.

Musk is a Texas resident and his electric car company Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) is based in Austin.

The case is McAferty v Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-01346.

This post appeared first on investing.com
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Morning Bid: Monitoring dollar, DeepSeek and China’s PMIs
next post
Diversified Energy near $1.3 bln deal for Maverick Natural Resources- WSJ

You may also like

British Land stock drops following stake sale

January 27, 2025

UMG shares rally after new multi-year pact with...

January 27, 2025

Italy’s MPS shares fall ahead of Mediobanca board...

January 27, 2025

Adani, Ambani news units sue OpenAI over copyright,...

January 27, 2025

Ryanair beats profit forecast on improving fares, trims...

January 27, 2025

China’s DeepSeek sets off AI market rout

January 27, 2025

Johnson Matthey to boost cash efficiency, cut spend...

January 27, 2025

Ryanair cuts 2026 traffic forecast amid ongoing Boeing...

January 27, 2025

SGS ends talks over potential $30 billion merger...

January 27, 2025

Lawyer group urges overhaul of US bank charter...

January 27, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Top News

    Boeing would avoid guilty plea, prosecution over 737...

    May 17, 2025

    Cava revenue beats estimates as Mediterranean chain reports...

    May 16, 2025

    Nvidia says it is not sending GPU designs...

    May 16, 2025

    Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian takes minority stake in...

    May 16, 2025

    ‘Shark Tank’ alum Bombas taps former Under Armour...

    May 16, 2025

    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 MarketGainsUpdates.com All Rights Reserved.

    Market Gains Updates
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Editor’s Pick