• Economy
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Sports
  • Editor’s Pick
Market Gains Updates
Politics

How is a political appointee different from a career federal employee?

by February 18, 2025
by February 18, 2025

Under President Donald Trump’s second administration so far, significant restructuring of the federal workforce has led to widespread layoffs and policy shifts designed to align with his agenda to eliminate bureaucracy. As these changes unfold, the divide between political appointees and career employees has become more apparent.

Political appointees, chosen by the president, serve at his discretion and include both Cabinet-level department heads and other senior-level officials. They are tasked with carrying out the administration’s agenda.

By contrast, career employees have permanent positions with civil service protections and are tasked with executing policies set by the political appointees above them.

‘We moved away from the spoils system, which is where the current administration gets to hire everybody in the government, towards a career civil service, in the 1880s,’ explained former Bush administration Cabinet member Tevi Troy in an interview with Fox News Digital.

‘And the idea is that you have a permanent government or permanent bureaucracy that carries out the work of the federal government, whether it’s administering checks or doing the census, whatever it is the government does that is managed by this career bureaucracy,’ Troy, also a presidential historian and a senior fellow at the Ronald Reagan Institute, said. ‘They have civil service protection, they are not supposed to set policy. They follow policy that is laid out by the president’s administration.’

Troy said there are about 2 million people in the federal workforce, and ‘at some point there’s a line.’

He described the line as ‘between who is setting policy’ and who is ‘carrying out what the mission of the federal government is supposed to be.’

‘And this argument is about the Trump administration feeling that at the most senior levels, there are certain career officials that were trying to set policy rather than carry out policy, and that’s where the disagreement is,’ he said.

Trump signed an executive order Tuesday seeking departments to make ‘large-scale reductions in force.’ As such, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by tech billionaire Elon Musk, has been instrumental in executing mass layoffs across various federal agencies, including the Federal Aviation Authority and the Departments of Education, Veterans Affairs and Energy, among others.

‘Although career employees enjoy significant employment protections, that does not mean that the president, who is the head of the executive branch, cannot eliminate jobs, as long as individuals are not politically targeted,’ Rachel Greszler, senior researcher at the Heritage Foundation’s economic Roe Institute, told Fox News Digital. ‘President Clinton issued an executive order in 1993, instructing agencies to eliminate 100,000 federal positions. While the initial order called for a 4% reduction in workforce, a 10% reduction instead ensued.’

Trump also instructed federal agencies last week to lay off most probationary workers who have not secured civil service protection. 

An Office of Personnel Management spokesperson told Fox News Digital previously, ‘the probationary period is a continuation of the job application process, not an entitlement for permanent employment. Agencies are taking independent action in light of the recent hiring freeze and in support of the president’s broader efforts to restructure and streamline the federal government to better serve the American people at the highest possible standard.’

This isn’t the first time a president has sought to shrink the federal government. Ronald Reagan also had the same goal, and particularly cut down the workforce in regulatory agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Energy. Bill Clinton also set out to reduce the size of the federal government, famously declaring in his 1996 State of the Union that the ‘era of big government is over.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Former USAID official warns China is already looking to fill void left by paused programs
next post
MAGA loyalists take aim at GOP senator as key Trump defense post sparks controversy: ‘Why the opposition?’

You may also like

Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim...

July 10, 2025

Watchdog backs Rubio’s sanctions on UN official over...

July 10, 2025

Biden doctor pleads the Fifth in speedy House...

July 9, 2025

US-backed Gaza aid group launches bold new system...

July 9, 2025

Far-left firebrand says she ‘never had a concern’...

July 9, 2025

Biden doctor dodges questions in speedy House closed-door...

July 9, 2025

Sotomayor breaks with Jackson in Supreme Court decision...

July 9, 2025

New book sheds light on Harris decision to...

July 9, 2025

Senate Republican moves to give US an edge...

July 9, 2025

DOJ lands legal victory as federal judge allows...

July 9, 2025
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News And Articles.

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Top News

    Amazon extends Prime Day discounts to 4 days...

    July 9, 2025

    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after...

    July 9, 2025

    Waymo offers teen accounts for driverless rides

    July 8, 2025

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew...

    July 7, 2025

    Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew...

    July 7, 2025

    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 MarketGainsUpdates.com All Rights Reserved.

    Market Gains Updates
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Sports
    • Editor’s Pick